1.  
  2. randomredux:

    chakrabot:

    durkin62:

    chakrabot:

    durkin62:

    chakrabot:

    slaaneshi-party-bus:

    marialuisa-pr:

    gynocraticgrrl:

    Jessica Rey presents the history of the evolution of the swimsuit including the origins of its design, how it has changed overtime and the post-feminist association of the bikini symbolizing female empowerment. She refers to neuro-scientific studies revealing how male brains react to images of scantily clad women versus images of women deemed modest and what the implications of the results are for women in society.

    (Note: As the OP, I disagree with Rey’s approach to putting the onus on women to alter ourselves rather than to alter the male perception of women – brain wiring has plenty to do with socialization and if we worked against the culture that fuels men’s objectification of women, women’s clothing choices would matter far less in terms of how men perceive us and determine how to interact with us).

    Jessica Rey - The Evolution of the Swim Suit

    bolding mine

    Wow this is some shit science. So yes when humans - not just men as the op implies - are shown videos that would involve the use of tools, then this specific area of the brain called left anterior supra marginal gyrus shows activity. So that’s really cool right? Know what else this area of the brain is involved in? Reading facial expressions.

    just the way her work is worded sounds unscientifically fluffed up. The sad thing is that there IS truth to what she’s saying… sort of… bbut she didn’t hit that nail on the head, so to speak.

    If she had cited the fact that men can readily identify parts of a woman’s body even when clipped or viewed upside down or at an angle far faster than they can identify the same images of other men, and faster than women can identify men in the same tests, therefore indicating that men categorize the female body as an object, not a person (something derived from the fact that their instant recognition regardless of placement is only really seen when a person recognizes an object), then she’d have something. But as someone who makes a living off of arousing men to make them dumb and compliant, and who likes to wear skimpy bikinis because *I* feel hot in them, I’m not really here for OP content.

    She intentionally left bit and pieces out to make this sound more plausible and severe. Here’s the whole study. http://www.kipnews.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Sexist-Attitudes-and-Neural1.pdf

    And it basically comes down to men are more likely to be aroused when looking at women scantly clad than fully clothed, Go fucking figure. Tax dollars well spent right there. Do the same study for women and compare the two, then there might be something worth discussing. 

    Bolding mine. Surprise fucking surprise. Extremism and lying by omission.

    Like… the need for feminism (*cough*egalitarianismalsorules*cough*) being what it is, it’s really fucking annoying that by and large, whenever someone wants to gain their space on the soap box, they shoot themselves in the foot and damage the movement by being manipulative, biased, and untruthful.

    If the whole argument wasn’t compelling enough for your point then you don’t have one. Things are often more middle-of-the-road than all this; life isn’t black and white. There’s plenty of other shit she could have said about men as a social entity.

    So I’ve been reading through the actual study trying to make more sense of it, originally trying to find which parts of the brain she is referencing here.( Pretty key thing to leave out.) Found some interesting bits.

    "Although men and women were, in general, slightly faster to pair images of sexualized female targets with first-person action verbs (e.g., push) and clothed female targets with third-person action verbs (e.g., pushes) than the inverse"

    Big fucking difference there between the studies findings, and what was said.

    "The whole-brain deviant-cell contrast demonstrated that passively viewing images of sexualized female targets activated the bilateral fusiform gyrus as well as bilateral inferior frontal regions."

    Which are responsible for, processing of color information, face and body recognition, word recognition, within-category identification. Pretty big stretch to claim it’s just for screwdrivers and shit.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inferior_frontal_gyrus

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusiform_gyrus

    I’d call her a liar but I’ve seen too many of these types to be that naive. They’re so deep into their own victim complexes they literally see things differently from the rest of the world. 

    You did the thing. Yes, good. For science.

    I hear these conclusions and this study brought up a lot and I often felt it was a bit suspect or cherry-picked.

    (via ealperin)

     

  3. I AM AWARE THAT I HAVE OUTSTANDING MESSAGES

    AND I AM SORRY FOR NOT REPLYING SOONER

    this week is kicking my buns :(

     
  4. femifeisty:

    biohazardgirl:

    singingtomysoul:

    I have never read a John Green novel.

    But I would care a lot more about critiques of him if any of the people I’ve seen shitting on him had actually read a John Green novel either.

    Or pretty much anything that has ever come out of his mouth.

    It’s really disgusting that people accuse John Green, a writer with clinical depression and anxiety to the point of it being very disabling at different times of his life, as someone who might romanticize and encourage teen suicide.

    As an aside, I love his self awareness about his own writing. That shit is hard to do.

    On the existence of his crash course videos alone, which provide free, accessible, consistent, intersectional, and quality higher level education to anyone with an internet connection (which is a fucking revolutionary concept and execution and should not be treated lightly) I am forever a fan of this man.

    I think a lot of this springs from people complaining that the character of Augustus Waters is pretentious. And like, yes, he is. But there’s a definite intention to that, and it doesn’t invalidate the rest of his writing. 

    I’ve read everything John Green has written, and while I acknowledge that his material is in NO WAY perfect, a lot of false accusations about his writing are being thrown around and I’m pretty not-okay with that. 

    (Source: iicarustiel, via sparrowwitharrows)

     
  5. tommyandangelina:

    Reblog this FOREVER.

    (Source: scarerants, via sparrowwitharrows)

     
  6. zzzzzsaddestsoul:

    zubat:

    tomche:

    unclefather:

    what does this mean

    no but seriously can someone translate this

    "Japanese tv shows be like"

    I LOVED THIS

    (via sparrowwitharrows)

     
     
  7. castielsteenwolf:

    im not sure whats happening but i like it alot

    (Source: , via sparrowwitharrows)

     
  8. hagakures-burger:

    bennybones-cumbercheeks:

    lordoftheinternet:

    poptech:

    And the highest paid public employee in your state is…

    are you fucking kidding me

    Do you ever just see America’s priorities and cry?

    (via sparrowwitharrows)

     
  9.  
  10. damianoisfamous:

    excadrill:

    the look


    So the internet just gave my tumblr name a whole new (literal) meaning. I was alerted to a photo of me gathering massive attention via a friend who linked me to a Reddit post titled “Don’t worry guys, I’m taking hipster to the next level.”

    Apparently some guy on the train uploaded this photo to twitter it has been spreading like wildfire since. Surprisingly when I read the thread on Reddit a lot of it was positive/supportive. I’m surprised by how unfazed and genuinely funny I find the negative comments. People’s theories as to why I am dressed like this, and who I really am are also really interesting. 

    I’m dressed like this for a number reasons. Firstly, and fore-mostly, I genuinely like the clothes I am wearing. I’ve described my look as “anywhere from hipster chic to kawaii gangsta Harajuku princess”. This is the epitome of the latter. I love sailor moon, I love pink, those converse are kawaii as fuck and yeah fuck you I’m wearing Prada sunglasses. I don’t really dress like this all the time, but I wish I did more often. I mostly don’t because I want to keep the look fresh. I wore this outfit because I had an art exhibition at my college and wanted to express myself.

    I also find men’s fashion extremely limiting in both types of clothes, cuts of clothes and colours. Women have so many beautiful options. So I pillage their aisles a lot because I wanna look pretty.

    This was also a statement. As an artist I think fashion is incredibly important. This day, I wanted something that not only reflected my personality and artistic sensibilities but also have some social commentary. A lot of my work, or what I want my work to speak about, is sex and sexuality and notions of gender and gender roles. How many of you knew pink actually use to be associated with boys, not girls? Personally I think the idea of “This is a boy colour”, “This is a girl colour” or “Barbies are for girls”, “Power Rangers are for boys” is dumb as fuck. Creating social and cultural boundaries does nothing but limit the potential of a person. By dressing like this I am breaking that boundary for myself and attempting to reflect that sentiment.  

    (Source: exxxmilitary, via ealperin)

     
  11. eternal-floette:

    How long until the 15 year olds take over this post with their garbage

    (Source: societates, via sparrowwitharrows)

     
  12. the-winchesters-and-their-angel:

    clarice-andherlittlelostlamb:

    nels5157:

    angrymadsygin:

    demons-put-onions-in-my-room:

    myoneandonlywonderland:

    Sheldon the tiny dinosaur
    Part 4/4

    SHELDON IS ONE OF MY FAVORITE THINGS LIKE EVERY SINGLE THING MAKES ME SO HAPPY ABOUT HIM

    Sheldon is the sweetest creature ever!

    omg!

    This may be the cutest/sweetest thing I’ve ever seen.

    this is incredibly cute oMG

    (via sparrowwitharrows)

     
  13. rod-in-3d:

    Hey. I made more.

    still practicing those silly colors.

    (via strangercreature)

     
  14. acquaintedwithrask:

    strampunkgear:

    foreverdisneynerd:

    For Atlantis, Disney needed a new language for the Atlantean people. To do this, Disney hired Mark Okrand, the man who also created the famous Klingon and Vulcan for the Star Trek series. In the Atlantean language, Mark Okrand’s main source for it’s roots and stems of its words are Proto-Indo-European,but as Okrand also described it as being the “tower of babel” or “root dialect” for all languages in the world, he also used ancient Chinese, Latin, Greek, Biblical Hebrew, along with many other ancient languages or their reconstructions. As such, you can actually learn to write and speak the language!

    This film is so underrated it hurts.

    ah this explains how they understood french and english so well almost instantly… better than the magical wind in Pocahontas that’s for sure

    (via ealperin)

     

  15. mbrainspaz:

    So my university had a ‘stress-free resort’ station set up today to help students combat the stress of finals week.
    There was a coloring table
    image
    complete with Lion King coloring books
    image
    There was a lego table
    image

    and PUPPIES
    image

    also, free massages. 

    This is the most wonderful thing that ever happened in four years of college. 

    (via achievementhuntress)